Home   Architects   Styles  

Objects

 

Library

   
 

 

 

 

 

 

OVERVIEW / PHOTOS ANS PLANS

 

 

Name   Einstein Tower
     
Architects   MENDELSOHN, ERICH
     
Date   1920-1924
     
Address   An der Sternwarte, 16, 14482 Potsdam, GERMANY
     
School   EXPRESSIONISM
     
Floor Plan    
     
Description    
   

True to modernism’s precepts, the Einstein Tower in Potsdam, Germany, designed and built by Erich Mendelsohn from 1919 to 1921, is one of the most unique expressions of avant-garde architecture of the early 20th century. Born in 1887, Mendelsohn was drawn to architecture at a young age. Like so many artists and architects at the fin-de-siècle, he believed that a new era was dawning, and that new forms of architecture were necessary for the modern epoch. In 1913 Mendelsohn met the astrophysicist Erwin Finlay Freundlich; the two men discovered shared interests and developed an enduring friendship. Freundlich introduced Mendelsohn to the then- unpublished radical theory of relativity by Albert Einstein, ideas that would profoundly influence European intellectual thought, as well as the visual arts, for years to come. Freundlich; was interested in making observations that would confirm Einstein’s new theory, and Mendelsohn sought to adapt Einsteinian principals to built forms endowed with expressive plasticity. Unfortunately, both mens’ plans were interrupted by the outbreak of World War I. In 1917, Mendelsohn was sent to the Western front.

During the war, Mendelsohn sketched continuously. These small sketches, in ink, of factories and observatories are remarkable for their abstract forms and stark play of light and dark. Mendelsohn began creating images of an architecture without reference to history or style. He indicated in his letters to his wife that these images came to him as fleeting visions that he labored to jot down before they vanished.

In 1918, Freundlich decided to build his own observatory in Potsdam where he could explore and apply Einsteinian principles. He immediately sent detailed information to Mendelsohn on the front. Early studies for the observatory for Freundlich are among Mendelsohn’s sketches.

Mendelsohn began serious work on the Einstein Tower in May 1920. Construction began in the summer of 1920; the exterior was completed by October 1921, and the project was generally finished by 1924. The plan, in keeping with modernist reductivism, was relatively simple; a vertical shaft was required down which light was reflected into a horizontal underground observation chamber. The finished building consisted primarily of a three-story tower supporting an observatory cupola, a ground-floor workroom, a second-floor room, and the underground observation area. However, the appearance of the structure is less like a device for scientific experiment than like a ship, airplane, or vehicle of transport already in motion across the landscape. The conceptual program was perhaps more complex than the functional one: Mendelsohn consciously strove to make a design devoid of right angles, that was molded rather than built, and that architecturally expressed the dynamic interchange of mass and energy inherent in Einstein’s theory of relativity. For this reason, he emphasized the interplay of mass and light, drawing on his impressionistic wartime sketches. The observatory was to be constructed of poured-in-place concrete, the only material Mendelsohn thought capable of expressing the dynamic possibilities of the new age. In the end, because of cost considerations and material wartime shortages, the underground portion was built in concrete, but the shaft of the tower was constructed of brick with a plaster finish.

The windswept form of the building reflects the conglomeration of a number of ideas and influences. In part, Mendelsohn’s thinking had been influenced by the German Expressionist writers and painters, such as Wassily Kandinsky, whose meetings he attended. Kandinsky’s metaphysical exploration of a new German Zeitgeist shaped by spiritual rather than rational forces proved particularly influential for Mendelsohn’s architecture.

The organic vitality of Jugendstil interior design and architecture was equally influential. Jugendstil (or German Art Nouveau) derived its sinuous and curvilinear motifs from nature, particularly from vines and trailing plants, which suggested fecundity and irrationality in their sensuous curving stems. The first-floor plans of the Einstein Tower seem to be derived from Jugendstil organicism, as seen in the ovoid entry porch, chrysalis-like stair chamber, and the curvaceous walls of the workroom, all of which evince references to germination and plantlike growth.

Finally, Mendelsohn’s concern for energy, dynamism, and vitalism led him to the ideas of the Italian Futurists and their manifestos, particularly to the work of artist Umberto Boccioni. For example, Boccioni’s sculpture, Unique Forms of Conti nuity in Space, of 1913—a virtual icon of Futurist ideals of power, movement, and violence—would seem to echo in the sense of undulating movement that is evoked by the curving walls of Mendelsohn’s Einstein Tower. In particular, the swept forms of the legs in Boccioni’s soldierlike sculpture find their way into the surrounds of the Tower’s first-floor windows, suggesting a kind of protective cowling against movement through some medium, as if the building were really a vehicle designed for travel.

The Einstein Tower became the most famous, albeit often misunderstood and esoteric, German building after World War I. Despite the fact that Einstein himself referred to the building in a private aside to Mendelsohn as organic, the architect’s intentions that the building formally embody the physicist’s theories was not generally perceived. In his later work, Mendelsohn continued to explore formal dynamism, but the work was much more linear and rational, using steel and glass, brick, and concrete slab. He never built anything like the Einstein Tower again.

The building functioned successfully as an observatory, yet its formal influence on other architects seems to have been minimal. In this regard, it is a victim of its own originality and uniqueness. It was a vision, but perhaps not visionary.

 

LAURENCE KEITH LOFTIN III

Sennott R.S. Encyclopedia of twentieth century architecture, Vol.1 (A-F).   Fitzroy Dearborn., 2005.

     
     
     
     
     
Photos and Plan    
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
   
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
   
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
   
   
     
   
   
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
   
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     

 

 

 


Architects

Library

New Projects

Objects

Schools

 


About

Contact

Support us